HP Support Assistant (HPSA) is a built-in software that comes with consumer HP desktop and laptop computers, intended to be an all-in-one solution for checking warranty information, troubleshooting, and most importantly in my opinion, software and driver updates. Dell SupportAssist and Lenovo Vantage are two similar tools and both perform reasonably well. HPSA, however, is nothing short of agony. The software is simply too dumb to be useful. Here is why.

Not a hands-free experience

HPSA will launch a separate window for certain updates and the user must follow the on-screen prompts to proceed. That means the user is constantly engaging with the computer for stupid things: clicking Next. Unnecessary work. Although this is common for Windows, updates in macOS through the App Store requires little user interaction if at all. Pretty much the whole process is automatic.

HPSA doesn’t know if installation is finished or not

For those updates that launch in to a separate installer, the installer does not communicate back to HPSA when installation is finished (and let HPSA go on with the next update, for example). To solve this, HPSA wants your human help, again:

confirm install results

Failure to install updates; unclear why

Sometimes the installation would just fail and give no indication as to why. “try again later” doesn’t help, either.

failed install

Failure to acknowledge successful installations

On a Slimline desktop, I manually downloaded and installed F.24 BIOS update from HP support website. Everything went smoothly. However, after “Check for updates and messages” HPSA is still telling me I need the F.24 BIOS update.

I reinstalled the BIOS update within HPSA software. Again everything went smoothly and no error messages whatsoever. The process looked no different from when I used the installer I manually downloaded from HP Support website, either. After the laptop rebooted, I logged into Windows and let HPSA check for updates again, sure enough, the BIOS update was still there.

The “Action Log” section also claims that the last installation failed, even though, again, nothing during the installation process indicated anything abnormal and System Information clearly says I have the F.24 BIOS.

fail to acknowledge

Failure to find the most current update

On an Envy 13 laptop, the current UEFI firmware/BIOS version is F.13. The latest BIOS is F.22 according to HP Support website. However, HPSA only finds an F.18 update, not the most current version F.22.

Failure to find existing updates

Sometimes HPSA cannot find an existing update at all.

On an Envy 13 laptop, the internal Intel SSD is running firmware HP01 while the HP Support website has released HP03 firmware update. However, this update would not even show up in HPSA.

Manual installation didn’t work, either. I downloaded the update file from HP Support website and tried to install it standalone. However, the update process command window popped up only briefly and immediately terminated itself before I could see anything in the command window. I had to run it in PowerShell as administrator to see what happened:

ssd fw fail

Updates disappear

Sometimes, an update would “disappear” during installation. In one instance, I was installing F.22 UEFI firmware update, when HPSA inexplicably notified me that the very firmware I was installing was no longer applicable. The laptop was running an older version of the firmware.

updates disappear

Update persists

Sometimes an update won’t go away in HPSA even after installation. This is a frequent problem with Intel chipset driver. As you can see in the Action Log, the chipset update is “Installed on: 2/24/18”. Yet it persists under available updates.

update persists

Duplicate updates

On a Slimline 270 desktop, HPSA finds two updates of the same nature, just different verisons. The desktop is running Windows 10 1709 with all latest Windows Update installed. Yet HPSA wants to install an update that is clearly intended for Windows 10 1607.


Why do I care?

Support software matters in two contexts: pre-built vs. custom-built, and Windows machines vs. Macs.

Maintenance and support has always been a major reason consumers would choose a pre-built computer from a major system integrator over a custom-built system. To keep a custom-built computer up to date on all driver and firmware updates, one has to follow multiple vendors’ support pages, e.g. motherboard, video card, network adapters, etc. Motherboard manufacturers in general don’t do a good job of frequently updating driver software except for the highest-end models. Most of their driver update software suck, too. This is potentially where HP shines, but the current version of HPSA has come up short. HPSA is not the worst support software I have used – Acer Care Center would not find me a single update when I know for a fact there are many available – but HP should be held to higher standards, shouldn’t it?

The macOS updates are handled much more elegantly. Even Lenovo Vantage (previously Lenovo Companion/System Update), which is the best support software in the Windows world in my opinion, does not match Macs when it comes to the experience in keeping my computer up to date. Why? Because a system integrator’s software is by definition a separate program from Windows Update, whereas the App Store in macOS handles everything from system updates to driver updates. A true all-in-one solution.

Which brings me to Microsoft Surface. If you can find a Surface device that fits your needs (in terms of performance levels, form factor, input devices, etc.), then I will argue it’s going to offer better user experience than HP/Dell/Lenovo/ASUS/Acer as far as maintenance and support goes, simply because of the higher level of integration of software and hardware. “It just works” is easier to achieve when the manufacturer controls both software and hardware, and is thus difficult to pull off with the traditional Windows ecosystem where HP and the likes pick hardware and Microsoft provides an operating system.

I am curious to see where Microsoft goes with the Surface line. Windows is great because of its high penetration, and having many hardware partners definitely help with maintaining that market share. But to truly manage user experience, Microsoft has to take everything into its own hands, and it must do so without annoying Dell, HP or Lenovo. A longer Surface line, especially one with more affordable models, seems like the very thing that would annoy Dell, HP and Lenovo.

But I wish to be proven wrong. I wish Microsoft and its partners find a way to carve out a market segment for affordable Surface devices. Or, alternatively, find a way to deliver driver and firmware updates through Windows Update for all Windows computers. I have already seen such delivery recently on a Dell Inspiron laptop where a Dell BIOS update is pushed over Windows Update, but the experience could be improved. I hope this method gets more polished over time and sees wider adoption in the future.